I've seen on my Facebook feed that some poets, even if previously published,
now have difficulty finding publishers. Ageism, not being the
flavour-of-the-month and disability, among other reasons, have been cited as
causes. These weren't why I chose not to publish in the conventional way, but
my commiserations go to those poets who'd like publication.
My reasons were different. In the 70s and 80s I did the usual rounds of
belonging to a poetry group/workshop in London, A
rvon
courses, book launches, readings, reading poets old and new, networking,
entering competitions, sending stuff off for publication and having some
published in poetry mags., going to all kinds of poetry events until I realised
what was involved in getting established. As I had a full-time job, was working
at a part-time Ph. D. (never finished because I retrained in my 40s for a
different career) and running a home, I simply hadn't the time to pursue
another work strand, so backed out of the poetry scene, wrote and studied
poetry for myself.
I continued, though, to familiarise myself with what was
going on in the poetry world, even to the extent of joining, in the late 90s, a
couple or three of online poetry workshops. Those helped me improve technically,
but I left on realising that, essentially, only poetry-by-committee was
acceptable and that my work most often stood outside the crowd. After that, I
continued to write on my own. Then, a few years ago and being semi-retired, I
started my own poetry blog; that gives some satisfaction and an outlet for
seeing my stuff in 'print,' as it were.
Now, the most I go for publicly is that maybe every two years or so, I'll
enter a competition, knowing my work will never be selected. Few judges or
publishers like polemical, political poetry and my other work doesn't and won't
follow fashionable dictates. Too, I've always been a loner and am happy to be
so. It doesn't matter and I'm neither bitter nor resigned, but just continue to
write what I please as well as I can because I can't not write. A particular
poem, once written, may go on my blog or back into the revision pile.
What does make me angry, though, is publication of other poets’ work turned
down for reasons outlined in the first paragraph and more like them, e.g.
racism, sexism, bias against working-class writers, non-recognition of
provincial poets, none of which are acceptable, but are often the reality when
taking part in what is essentially a competitive field. Of course there are individual
and group solutions to this, finding like-minded groups of poets, starting up
poetry magazines, protesting to the extent that the poetry world does hear
about issues that rankle, and so on. I’ve seen a few changes over the years,
but the fundamental issues haven't gone away; people have just hived off from
the mainstream and done what they needed to do.
Often those fundamentals aren’t tackled because
many
publishers, judges, etc. may not question or even realise their own built-in biases.
I’m aware, too, that it happens in other literary and arts genres than poetry.
There’s not much that can be done about that in the short-term, except to keep
raising the issues and protesting where possible. In the long-term it’s
probably a matter of keeping poetry and its publishing life before the public’s
eye, in the hope that minorities among poets become minorities no longer.
Whatever, I shall just keep going my own way and be ever thankful for the
people who do read my work.